Brezplačna dostava za naročila nad 69,99 € na prevzemna mesta DPD in Express One.

Preverjanje stanja naročila

Postanite del skupnosti ljubiteljev knjig z vsega sveta in uživajte v številnih ugodnostih. Ustvarite brezplačen račun

Brezplačna dostava Zásilkovna nad 69.99 €

Zbirna točka GLS 4.49 € Zbirna točka DPD 2.99 € Kurirska služba GLS 5.49 € Kurir DPD 3.49 € Kurirska služba Express One 3.49 € Zbirno mesto Express One 3.49 € Zbirno mesto Pošte Slovenije 3.49 € Dostava preko Pošte Slovenije 3.49 €

Kontakt

Kako nakupovati

Pomoč

Moj račun

▸ Prazna :-(

Brezplačna dostava za naročila nad 69,99 € na prevzemna mesta DPD in Express One.

No Magic Wand

Name: No Magic Wand
Brand: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
SKU: 40248620
Price: 42.75 EUR
Availability: InStock
Author: David S. Caudill
ISBN: 9781461640363

The Idealization of Science in Law

David S. Caudill

Lewis H. LaRue

Jezik

Angleščina

E-knjiga Adobe ePub DRM

Založba Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, junij 2006

Since 1993, Supreme Court precedent has asked judges to serve as gatekeepers to their expert witness... Celoten opis

Koda Libristo: 40248620

104 b

42.75 €

Na zalogi Prenesi zdaj

Drugi so kupili tudi

Die Eurasische Union. Vorteile, Gefahren und Realisierungschancen Michael Kraft

Mehka

16.17 €

Tempo & Magma Tigana Santana

Zvočni CD

21.93 €

Die NAPOLA Reichenau Arnulf Moser

Mehka

17.88 €

Tecnologia de Informacion para la Transformacion de los Negocios Alanis Macedonio Alanis

Mehka

16.67 €

KundenTypen Ilonka Lutjen

Adobe ePub DRM

11.82 €

Music for Alto Recorder Tiskani izdelki

Note

9.49 €

Шаг за шагом. Русский язык. Учебник А2.2 Елизавета Хамраева

Mehka

24.66 €

Since 1993, Supreme Court precedent has asked judges to serve as gatekeepers to their expert witnesses, admitting only reliable scientific testimony. Lacking a strong background in science, however, some judges admit dubious scientific testimony packages by articulate practitioners, while others reject reliable evidence that is unreasonably portrayed as full of holes. Seeking a balance between undue deference and undeserved skepticism, Caudill and LaRue draw on the philosophy of science to help judges, juries, and advocates better understand its goals and limitations.